This Is The Biggest Scandal And Injustice Of Our Times

We all know of our centuries of English originating Law for Australia, USA ,England and others but do we know the specifics of it well enough.

This article is to address the specifics of the Law of Nullity and try to determine its specifics and see if you knew them. Also to bring attention to a 33+ year old matter which is a particular Nullity that is attempting to say its different to being a Nullity.

What I am citing is what a specific Legal Course I did in the 1990’s told me and as the official thing of what Nullity in Law is.

A Nullity in Law is Null and Void of any legal validity.

To explain this I will start with what the course told me, also as the official actual thing, of the specifics of a Charge in our Law.

– It said –

A Charge is must be the one same thing for everyone and everything for the Defence to have its chance to know the Charge and prepare a defence to(which includes whether to plead innocent or guilty) with everyone else also pertaining to and subject to that one same Charge extent.

The Charge Sheet wording must be 100% unambiguous to prevent shifting ground.

The Charge Sheet wording applying to and as the one Charge in one Count.

Amendments beyond the Count of the Charge are a Nullity.

The police Brief surrounding the Charge setting the situation and nature of the Charge.

– Unquote –

There as it says amendments beyond the Count are a Nullity.

Another particular Nullity and the one in question here is the Nullity of Strict Liability (Count) if it tries to represent Mens Rea (Count).

With the Charge Nullity there is a Charge then going into being a Nullity and/or that aspect of it going into being a Nullity.

With the Nullity of SL rep MR it already is a Nullity at all with no amendment, exemption, recharge or any other such procedure available if SL rep MR is mistakenly attempted as a Charge or other usage.

The Strict Liability Law is centuries old that all who use the English Law like Australia USA England and others have been using and is significantly society wide requite in its uniform operation related to any and all legal matters with any and all subject to it. A basic 2+2=4 element of our legal relevances.

One aspect of Strict Liability Law it is that no interpretation distinct from it or anything made out by it has any validity for the extent of the distinct attempting purport and with this particularly so of SL rep MR.

So this matter is SL rep MR and is the only thing trying to purport difference to the made out in all that history and breadth so I would like some sort of fair process shake for it instead of very much no such thing 33+ years so far.

Full enough details from my side exist in and as the articles in my X profile.

Hope we can begin to get this matter settled as its facts and law sometime.

Cheers all.